Chapter 1. Methodology and Scope
1.1. Market Segmentation & Scope
1.2. Research Methodology
1.3. Research Scope & Assumption
1.4. Information Procurement
1.4.1. Purchased Database
1.4.2. GVR’s Internal Database
1.4.3. Secondary Sources & Third-Party Perspectives
1.4.4. Primary Research
1.5. Information Analysis
1.5.1. Data Analysis Models
1.6. Market Formulation & Data Visualization
1.7. Data Validation & Publishing
Chapter 2. Waste Management Market Intelligence
2.1. Category Definition
2.2. Category Intelligence
2.2.1. Market Size
2.2.2. Trends
2.2.3. Drivers
2.2.4. Challenges
2.2.5. Segmental Outlook
2.2.6. Regional Outlook
2.3. Technology
2.3.1. Emerging Technology
2.3.2. Best Practices in the Industry
2.4. Regulatory Landscape
2.5. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
2.5.1. Bargaining power of suppliers
2.5.2. Bargaining power of buyers
2.5.3. Threat of substitutes
2.5.4. Threat of new entrants
2.5.5. Competitive rivalry
Chapter 3. Waste Management Market Supplier Intelligence
3.1. Identification of top 14 service providers
3.1.1. Biffa Ltd.
3.1.2. Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
3.1.3. Clean Harbors, Inc.
3.1.4. Daiseki Co., Ltd.
3.1.5. FCC Environmental
3.1.6. Hitachi Zosen Corporation
3.1.7. Remondis SE & Co. KG
3.1.8. Republic Services
3.1.9. Stericycle, Inc.
3.1.10. SUEZ SA
3.1.11. Valicor Environmental Services
3.1.12. Veolia Environnement SA
3.1.13. Waste Connections, Inc.
3.1.14. Waste Management, Inc.
3.2. Waste Management Supply Chain Analysis
3.3. Waste Management Supplier Landscape
3.4. Waste Management Supplier Ranking Methodology
3.4.1. Supplier Operational Capabilities
3.4.1.1. Industries Served
3.4.1.2. Certifications
3.4.1.3. Employee Strength
3.4.1.4. Geographical Service Provision
3.4.1.5. Years in Service
3.4.1.6. Revenue Generated
3.4.2. Supplier Functional Capabilities
3.4.2.1. Industrial Waste Management
3.4.2.2. Municipal Waste Management
3.4.2.3. Medical Waste Management
3.4.2.4. E-Waste Management
3.4.2.5. Others
3.5. Waste Management Supplier Scoring Criteria
3.6. Waste Management Supplier Positional Matrix (SPM)
3.6.1. Rulers
3.6.2. Challengers
3.6.3. Loungers
3.6.4. Niches
3.7. Waste Management Supplier Market Concentration
3.7.1. Industry structure
3.8. Recommended Waste Management Service Providers
3.8.1. Supplier 1 with detailed profile
3.8.2. Supplier 2 with detailed profile
3.8.3. Supplier 3 with detailed profile
Chapter 4. Competitive Landscape
4.1. Recent Supplier Developments with Measured Impact
4.1.1. Joint Ventures
4.1.2. Mergers & Acquisitions
4.1.3. Collaborations or Partnerships
4.1.4. Other major developments
4.2. Supply-Demand Analysis
4.2.1. Supply Analysis
4.2.2. Demand Analysis
Chapter 5. Waste Management Pricing and Cost Intelligence
5.1. Cost Structure Overview
5.1.1. Machineries & Equipments
5.1.2. Labor
5.1.3. Rent & Utilities
5.1.4. Logistics
5.1.5. Maintenance & Repair
5.1.6. Others
5.2. Pricing Intelligence
5.2.1. Factors Influencing the Rates of Waste Management Services
5.2.2. Diesel Prices in the U.S.
5.2.3. Pricing Model Analysis
5.2.3.1. Fixed-Fee or,
5.2.3.2. Cost plus or,
5.2.3.3. Volume based or,
5.2.3.4. Value based or,
5.2.3.5. Dynamic pricing model or,
5.2.3.6. Competitive pricing model or,
5.2.3.7. Others
5.2.4. Waste Management Rates - Service Provider’s Quotation
Chapter 6. Sourcing Intelligence
6.1. Engagement Model
6.1.1. Fully Outsourcing Model or,
6.1.2. Partial/Hybrid Outsourcing Model or,
6.1.3. In-house Product Development Model or,
6.1.4. Shared Service Model
6.2. Operating Model
6.2.1. Basic Provider or,
6.2.2. Approved Provider or,
6.2.3. Performance-based Model or,
6.2.4. Others
6.3. KPI/SLA Elements
6.4. Negotiation Strategies
6.5. LCC/BCC Sourcing Analysis
6.5.1. India
6.5.2. Germany
6.5.3. South Korea
6.5.4. Denmark
6.5.5. Sweden
6.5.6. Insights on top 2 LCC/BCC Countries
6.6. Exports of Plastic Waste, by Country
Component wise cost break down for better negotiation for the client, highlights the key cost drivers in the market with future price fluctuation for different materials (e.g.: steel, aluminum, etc.) used in the production process
Offering cost transparency for different products / services procured by the client. A typical report involves 2-3 case scenarios helping clients to select the best suited engagement with the supplier
Determining and forecasting salaries for specific skill set labor to make decision on outsourcing vs in-house.
A typical newsletter study by capturing latest information for specific suppliers related to: M&As, technological innovations, expansion, litigations, bankruptcy etc.